![]() |
The Proto-Freelance Modelers "How long ago a flag fell does not matter as long as there are railfans and <-- RockyCrater.org :: Home :: 1948 Atlas :: Posters :: Prototype Data :: Facebook Page :: Links |
[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 49, Volume 4]
[Revised as of October 1, 2003]
[CITE: 49CFR268]
[Page 742-749]
TITLE 49--TRANSPORTATION
CHAPTER II--FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PART 268--MAGNETIC LEVITATION TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGY DEPLOYMENT PROGRAM
Subpart A--Overview
Sec.
268.1 Definitions.
268.3 Different phases of the Maglev Deployment Program.
268.5 Federal funding sources for the Maglev Deployment Program.
268.7 Federal/State share and restrictions on the uses of Federal Maglev
Funds.
Subpart B--Procedures For Financial Assistance
268.9 Eligible participants.
268.11 Project eligibility standards.
268.13 Deadline for submission of applications for preconstruction
planning assistance.
268.15 Form and contents of applications for preconstruction planning
assistance.
268.17 Project selection criteria.
268.19 Evaluation of applications for preconstruction planning
assistance.
268.21 Down-selection of one or more Maglev projects for further study
and selection of one project for final design, engineering,
and construction funding.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322; 23 U.S.C. 322; 49 CFR 1.49.
Source: 65 FR 2344, Jan. 14, 2000, unless otherwise noted.
Subpart A--Overview
Sec. 268.1 Definitions.
As used in this part--
CMAQ means Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program
(23 U.S.C. 149).
Environmental assessment (``EA'') means the environmental assessment
in support of the project description and containing the information
listed in Sec. 268.11(b)(6)(i).
Environmental impact statement (``EIS'') means the environmental
impact statement which is required pursuant to Secs. 268.3.
Eligible project costs means the costs of preconstruction planning
activities and the capital cost of the fixed guideway infrastructure of
a Maglev project, including land, piers, guideways, propulsion equipment
and other components attached to guideways, power distribution
facilities (including substations), control and communications
facilities, access roads, and storage, repair, and maintenance
facilities, but eligible project costs do not include the cost of
stations, vehicles, and equipment.
Federal Maglev funds means such funds as are provided under the
authority of 23 U.S.C. 322 to pay for Eligible Project Costs.
Full project costs means the total capital costs of a Maglev
project, including Eligible Project Costs and the costs of stations,
vehicles, and equipment.
Phase means one of the five different phases of the Maglev
Deployment Program; these phases are described in Sec. 268.3.
Maglev means transportation systems employing magnetic levitation
that would be capable of safe use by the public at a speed in excess of
240 miles per hour.
Maglev Deployment Program means the program authorized by 23 U.S.C.
322.
Partnership potential means the usage of the term in the commercial
feasibility study of high-speed ground transportation (High Speed Ground
Transportation for America) mandated under section 1036 of the
Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat.
1978). Under that usage any corridor exhibiting Partnership Potential
must at least meet the following two conditions:
(1) Private enterprise must be able to run on the corridor--once
built and paid for--as a completely self-sustaining entity; and
(2) The total benefits of a Maglev corridor must equal or exceed its
total costs.
STP means the Surface Transportation Program (23 U.S.C. 133).
[[Page 743]]
TEA 21 means the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
(Public Law No. 105-178, 112 Stat. 107).
Sec. 268.3 Different phases of the Maglev Deployment Program.
(a) The Maglev Deployment Program includes five phases, as described
in paragraphs (b) through (f) of this section. The current projected
timing for implementing these phases is indicated to assist applicants
in planning their projects. All dates beyond the first date (the
deadline for the submission of preconstruction planning applications)
are for planning purposes only and are subject to change--including
possible acceleration of deadlines--based on the progress of the Maglev
Deployment Program; grantees will be notified accordingly.
(b) Phase I--Competition for Planning Grants (Early October 1998--
September 15, 1999). (1) Description. In Phase I, States will apply for
funds for preconstruction planning activities. As required by
Sec. 268.13, applications must be filed with FRA by February 15, 1999.
FRA will select one or more projects to receive preconstruction planning
financial assistance awarded under this part to perform Phase II of the
Maglev Deployment Program.
(2) Timing of Major Milestones.
(i) February 15, 1999--Planning grant applications due.
(ii) May 24, 1999--FRA announces grantees for planning grants.
(iii) August 31, 1999--FRA awards planning grants for the conduct of
activities listed in Phase II.
(c) Phase II--Project Description Development (July 1, 1999--June
30, 2000).
(1) Description. In Phase II, each grant recipient will prepare and
submit to FRA a project description, supporting preconstruction planning
reports, and an EA. Supporting reports may include demand and revenue
analyses, project specification, cost estimates, scheduling, financial
studies, a system safety plan (including supporting analysis), and other
information in support of the project description. FRA will use this
information in reaching a decision on which projects to down-select for
completion of site-specific environmental studies, investment grade
revenue forecasts, and other studies and analyses necessary prior to
initiation of construction. FRA will initiate documentation of
environmental factors considered in the project selection process.
(2) Timing of Major Milestones.
(i) February 29, 2000--Deadline for submission of appropriate EA's
needed by FRA for the down-selection of one or more projects under Phase
III.
(ii) June 30, 2000--Deadline for submission of project descriptions
and any related supporting reports needed by FRA for down-selection of
one or more projects.
(d) Phase III--Project Selection Process (July 1, 2000--September
30, 2000). (1) Description. FRA will evaluate the information provided
by the grant recipients under Phase II and will down-select one or more
projects for completion of additional environmental studies, investment
grade revenue forecasts, and other studies and analyses necessary prior
to initiation of construction.
(2) Timing of Major Milestones. September 30, 2000--FRA down-selects
one or more project(s).
(e) Phase IV--Project Development and Completion of Site-specific
EIS October 1, 2000--November 30, 2001).
(1) Description. The financial assistance recipient(s) down-selected
in Phase III will complete additional environmental studies, investment
grade revenue forecasts, and other studies and analyses necessary prior
to initiation of construction, and address issues raised by FRA's review
of system safety plans (including supporting analysis). They will also
initiate final design and engineering work for the down-selected
project(s). If more than one project is down-selected in Phase III, FRA
will select one of them for final design, engineering, and construction
funding. Detailed agreements for the construction and operation of the
selected project will be negotiated.
(2) Timing of Major Milestones. (i) March 31, 2001--If more than one
project is down-selected in Phase III, FRA will select one project.
(ii) December 31, 2001--FRA will issue a Final Record of Decision on
the site-specific EIS for the one selected project, confirming the
project design.
[[Page 744]]
(f) Phase V--Completion of Detailed Engineering and Construction
January 1, 2002 and beyond). In Phase V, the sponsoring State or State-
designated authority will oversee the efforts of the public/private
partnership formed to progress the selected project, to complete the
detailed engineering designs, and finance, construct, equip, and operate
the project in revenue service. Construction will be contingent upon the
appropriation of Federal funds. In no event will construction be
authorized until FRA is fully satisfied that the system will meet
appropriate safety standards.
Sec. 268.5 Federal funding sources for the Maglev Deployment Program.
(a) Federal Maglev Funds. Section 322 of Title 23 provides for the
following funds for the Maglev Deployment Program:
(1) Contract authority. Fifty-five million has been made available
for the Maglev Deployment Program as contract authority from the Highway
Trust Fund for Fiscal Years 1999 through 2001; this would be used to
fund the competition in all its phases and could also be used for final
design, engineering, and construction activities of the selected
project. Of the $55 million, the Congress has made available up to $15
million for Fiscal Year 1999, up to $15 million for Fiscal Year 2000,
and $25 million for Fiscal Year 2001.
(2) Authorization for appropriations. Nine hundred fifty million,
also from the Highway Trust Fund, has been authorized to be appropriated
for the Maglev Deployment Program for Fiscal Years 2000 through 2003. Of
the $950 million, $200 million is authorized to be appropriated for each
of Fiscal Years 2000 and 2001, $250 million for Fiscal Year 2002, and
$300 million for Fiscal Year 2003. Any decision to proceed with possible
Federal funding of the construction of a Maglev system will be
contingent upon the receipt of appropriations, and upon completion of
appropriate environmental documentation.
(b) Other Federal funds. Section 322 of Title 23 provides that the
portion of the Maglev project not covered by Federal Maglev Funds may be
covered by any non-Federal funding sources--including private (debt and/
or equity), State, local, regional, and other public or public/private
entities--as well as by Federally-provided STP and CMAQ funds, and by
other forms of financial assistance made available under title 23 and
TEA 21, such as loans and loan guarantees.
(c) Costs Incurred in Advance of Cooperative Agreement. Certain
costs incurred in advance of the execution of a cooperative agreement
between FRA and the grantee for pre-construction planning but after
enactment of TEA 21 (June 9, 1998) will be eligible for reimbursement,
but such costs are allowable only to the extent that they are otherwise
allowable under the terms of a fully executed cooperative agreement.
Sec. 268.7 Federal/State share and restrictions on the uses of Federal
Maglev Funds.
(a) Federal share. The Federal share of Full Projects Costs shall be
not more than \2/3\, with the remaining \1/3\ paid by the grant
recipient using non-Federal funds. Funds made available under STP and
CMAQ are considered non-Federal funds for purposes of the matching
requirement.
(b) Restrictions on the uses of Federal Maglev Funds. (1) Federal
Maglev Funds may be applied only to Eligible Project Costs;
(2) Federal Maglev Funds provided under a preconstruction planning
grant may be used only for Phase II activities, and for completion of
site-specific draft EIS's; see Sec. 268.3;
(3) Federal Maglev Funds may be used to pay for only \2/3\ of
preconstruction planning costs; grant recipients are required to pay the
remaining \1/3\ of the costs with non-Federal funds; and
(4) The ``prevailing wages'' requirement of the Davis Bacon Act (40
U.S.C. 276a-276a-5) applies to any construction contracts under the
Maglev Deployment Program.
[[Page 745]]
Subpart B--Procedures For Financial Assistance
Sec. 268.9 Eligible participants.
Any State, or any authority designated by one or more State(s) to
carry out the preconstruction planning activities under the Maglev
Deployment Program is eligible to participate in the Maglev Deployment
Program.
Sec. 268.11 Project eligibility standards.
(a) Project eligibility standards for preconstruction planning
financing. (1) As required by 23 U.S.C. 322(d)(4), in order to be
eligible to receive financial assistance, a Maglev project shall:
(i) Involve a segment or segments of a high-speed ground
transportation corridor that exhibit Partnership Potential;
(ii) Require an amount of Federal funds for project financing that
will not exceed the sum of Federal Maglev Funds, and the amounts made
available by States under STP and CMAQ;
(iii) Result in an operating transportation facility that provides a
revenue producing service;
(iv) Be undertaken through a public and private partnership, with at
least \1/3\ of Full Project Costs paid using non-Federal funds;
(v) Satisfy applicable statewide and metropolitan planning
requirements;
(vi) Be approved by FRA based on an application submitted by a State
or authority designated by one or more States;
(vii) To the extent that non-United States Maglev technology is used
within the United States, be carried out as a technology transfer
project; and
(viii) Be carried out using materials at least 70 percent of which
are manufactured in the United States.
(2) FRA recognizes that applicants for preconstruction planning
grants will not have detailed information with respect to some of the
requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of this section, and that the purpose
of a preconstruction planning grant is to develop much of this
information with respect to a particular Maglev project. As required by
Sec. 268.15, an applicant will need to provide whatever information it
has with respect to each of the requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of this
section, together with a certification that the applicant fully intends
to comply with the requirements of this paragraph (a) should its project
be selected by FRA for final design, engineering and construction
financing.
(b) Project eligibility standards for final design, engineering, and
construction financing. FRA will select the most promising Maglev
project for final design, engineering, and construction financing. To be
eligible to be considered, the project must meet each of the following
requirements; these requirements restate the requirements in paragraph
(a)(1) of this section, but with more detail and in a different order:
(1) Purpose and significance of the project. (i) The project
description shall point to a Maglev facility and daily operation the
primary purpose of which is the conduct of a revenue-producing passenger
transportation service between distinct points, rather than a service
solely for the passengers' riding pleasure.
(ii) The project description shall incorporate scheduled operation
at a top speed of not less than 240 mph.
(2) Benefits for the American economy. The project description shall
include a certification as to paragraphs (b)(2) (i) and (ii) of this
section and, as appropriate, a technology acquisition/transfer plan
which describes the strategy for their accomplishment.
(i) Processes will be established that will enable an American-owned
and -sited firm (or firms) to gain, in the course of the project, the
capability to participate in the design, manufacture, and installation
of the facilities and vehicles needed for a Maglev operation, if the
owner of the selected version of Maglev technology is not an American-
owned and -sited firm (thus meeting the technology transfer requirement
of 23 U.S.C. 322).
(ii) The 70 percent U.S. content requirement content of 23 U.S.C.
322 will be carried out.
(3) Partnership potential. The project shall exhibit Partnership
potential by satisfying the following:
(i) A private/public partnership must be in place that is ready,
willing, and able to finance, construct, operate, and maintain the
project;
[[Page 746]]
(ii) The private/public partnership either owns the version of
Maglev technology proposed to be implemented in the project, or has an
agreement with the owner which affords full cooperation to the
partnership in progressing the project, including implementation of the
technology acquisition/transfer plan if applicable; and
(iii) The recipient of a preconstruction planning grant or the FRA
has developed and endorsed a projection of system capital costs, demand,
revenues, operating expenses, and total costs and benefits, that:
(A) Covers either the entire corridor in which the Maglev project is
involved (``Corridor''), or the project considered independently;
(B) Demonstrates that private enterprise would be able to run the
Corridor or the project--once built and paid for--as a completely self-
sustaining entity, in which revenues will cover operating expenses and
continuing investment needs; and
(C) Shows total benefits equal to or exceeding total costs.
(4) Funding Limits and Sources. The project description shall
include a financing plan that demonstrates project completion with the
$950 million in Federal Maglev Funds, funds remaining unobligated from
the $55 million in contract authority, and the funds made available
under STP and CMAQ. The project that is selected will be eligible for
other forms of financial assistance provided under title 23 and TEA 21,
including loans, loan guarantees, and lines of credit. However, at least
\1/3\ of Full Project Costs must come from non-Federal Funds.
(5) Project Management. The State, the technology owner, and all
other relevant project partners must include in the project description,
an agreed upon--
(i) Management plan that defines the partnership, responsibilities,
and procedures for accomplishing the project;
(ii) Project schedule that shows how timely implementation of the
project will be accomplished, including, to the extent possible, a
construction plan and schedule; and
(iii) Financial plan that shows how funds will flow, in accordance
with the other requirements of this subsection.
(6) Planning/environmental process.
(i) Assessment of environmental consequences of the proposed
project. Recipients of preconstruction planning grants shall conduct an
EA in support of the project description; and will prepare additional
environmental studies for the project. The EA shall include information
to support the grantee's decision to pursue the proposed project. The
grantee shall develop the information and discuss the environmental
consequences of the proposed technology and route in sufficient detail
for the preparation of appropriate documentation by FRA to support
selection of one project. This shall include: the identification of
potential positive and negative environmental effects resulting from the
technology (e.g. energy consumption compared to other transportation
options); generic noise emissions at various distances from the
centerline of the guideway; changes in electromagnetic field levels at
various distances from the centerline of the guideway; and environmental
screening of the proposed route (e.g., identification of land use;
identification of endangered species possibly present and location of
their critical habitat; identification of navigable waterways, wetlands
and other sensitive water resources; and identification of the location
of parks, wildlife refuges, historic and archaeological sites of
National, State or local significance and other sites protected by
section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act). The latter
information and analysis shall be submitted four months in advance of
the remainder of the project description. The above list is illustrative
only. Grantees will be expected to review proposed work statements with
FRA at pre-application meetings or through some other means to develop
the final scope of this environmental review.
(ii) The project description must also include letters of
endorsement of project implementation from all the State departments of
transportation involved, and from all Metropolitan Planning
Organizations for metropolitan areas that would be served by the
project.
[[Page 747]]
Sec. 268.13 Deadline for submission of applications for preconstruction
planning assistance.
Completed application packages shall be returned to FRA by December
31, 1998. Applications shall be submitted to: Honorable Jolene M.
Molitoris, Administrator, Federal Railroad Administration, ATTN: Maglev
Project, RDV-11, 400 Seventh Street, SW, Stop 20,Washington, DC 20590.
Sec. 268.15 Form and contents of applications for preconstruction
planning assistance.
States, groups of States, or designated authorities that have Maglev
projects are invited to submit applications in Phase I of the Maglev
Deployment Program, the competition for preconstruction planning grants.
The applications shall contain:
(a)(1) If submitted by a State: name, address, responsible party,
telephone, fax number, and e-mail address of the State agency submitting
the application; or
(2) If submitted by a designated authority: name, address,
responsible party, telephone, fax number, and e-mail address of the
designated authority and of the State agency or agencies on whose behalf
the designated authority is submitting the application, together with
letters from the State(s) evidencing all such designations;
(b) A description of the project concept, identifying its likely
location, market area, length, and the transportation service that it
would perform, and a preliminary estimate of the time that would be
required--if funds are made available--to bring the project to the start
of construction and then to the initiation of full revenue service. At
its option, the applicant may include any reports already completed on
the project as well as any additional descriptive material that would
assist the FRA in evaluating the application;
(c) Whatever information the applicant has to demonstrate that the
project meets the project eligibility standards in Sec. 269.11(a), and
the project selection criteria in Sec. 268.17. together with a
certification that the applicant fully intends to comply with the
requirements in Sec. 269.11 should its project be selected by FRA for
final design, engineering and construction financing.
(d) A statement of work for the preconstruction planning activities
to be accomplished under the planning grant. The statement shall
describe the work to be performed, including but not necessarily limited
to:
(1) Preconstruction planning work as is needed to develop a Maglev
project, and project description that will satisfy the project
eligibility standards in Sec. 268.11(b), and the project selection
criteria in Sec. 268.17; and
(2) Preparation of EAs, as described in Sec. 268.11(b)(6)(i);
(e) Management plan, schedule, and financial plan for accomplishing
the preconstruction planning work under the planning grant;
(f) Letters supporting the application from the heads of all State
departments of transportation involved, as well as from responsible
officials of the Metropolitan Planning Organizations of all metropolitan
areas to be served by the proposed project;
(g) A certification from the State, or from the authority designated
by one or more States, that the \1/3\ matching funds required for work
under the planning grant are, or will be, available by the time the
grants are announced. The source(s) of the matching must be shown in the
financial plan under paragraph (e); and
(h) If the applicant has made a definitive choice of the particular
Maglev technology proposed to be included, a description of that
technology and the degree to which it has been produced and tested
should be submitted. Further, if the applicant has identified
organizations that would form members of the team that would implement
the project, the names of those organizations and the persons
representing them should also be submitted.
Sec. 268.17 Project selection criteria.
Except as qualified by Sec. 268.19, the following criteria will
govern FRA's selection of projects to receive funding under the Maglev
Deployment Program.
(a) Purpose and significance of the project.
(1) The degree to which the project description demonstrates
[[Page 748]]
attractiveness to travelers, as measured in passengers and passenger-
miles.
(2) The extent to which implementation of the project will reduce
congestion, and attendant delay costs, in other modes of transportation;
will reduce emissions and/or energy consumption; or will reduce the rate
of growth in needs for additional highway or airport construction.
Measures for this criterion will include but not be limited to the
present value of congestion reduction, pollution reduction, and/or
facility cost-avoidance benefits.
(3) The degree to which the project will demonstrate the variety of
operating conditions which are to be expected in the United States.
(4) The degree to which the project will augment a Maglev corridor
or network that has been identified, by any State, group of States, or
the FRA, as having Partnership Potential.
(b) Timely implementation. The speed with which the project can
realistically be brought into full revenue service, based on the project
description and on the current and projected development status of the
Maglev technology selected by the applicant for the project.
(c) Benefits for the American economy. The extent to which the
project is expected to create new jobs in traditional and emerging
industries in the United States.
(d) Partnership potential. The degree to which the project
description demonstrates Partnership Potential for the corridor in which
it is involved, and/or for the project independently.
(e) Funding limits and sources. (1) The extent and proportion to
which States, regions, and localities commit to financially contributing
to the project, both in terms of their own locally-raised, entirely non-
Federal funds, and in terms of commitments of scarce Federal resources
from non-Maglev funds; and
(2) The extent and proportion to which the private sector
contributes financially to the project.
Note to Sec. 268.17: FRA recognizes that applicants for
preconstruction planning assistance may not have detailed information
with respect to each of these criteria, and that the purpose of the
preconstruction planning assistance is to develop much of this
information with respect to a particular Maglev project. The
preconstruction planning application requirements of this part 268 are
designed to elicit whatever information an applicant may have pertaining
to these criteria.
Sec. 268.19 Evaluation of applications for preconstruction planning
assistance.
The FRA will evaluate the applications for their completeness and
responsiveness to the requirements listed in Sec. 268.15. In addition,
applicants are advised that the Maglev Deployment Program contains a
number of project eligibility standards (minimum threshold standards)
and project evaluation criteria that will guide the FRA's review of the
project descriptions produced under the Planning Grants. The FRA's
implementation of these standards and criteria appears in Sec. 268.11
and Sec. 268.17, respectively. Although subject to revision, the
information in Sec. 268.11 and Sec. 268.17 should assist the States in
completing their applications in the competition for planning grants,
since the project descriptions will need to respond to the standards and
criteria. In evaluating the applications for planning grants, FRA will
consider how consistent the applicant's project is to the standards and
criteria, and the application's likelihood of leading to a project that
meets all the standards and criteria.
Sec. 268.21 Down-selection of one or more Maglev projects for further
study and selection of one project for final design,
engineering, and construction funding.
(a) Upon completion of Phase III of the Maglev Deployment Program,
FRA will down-select one or more projects to complete additional
environmental studies, investment grade revenue forecasts, and other
studies and analyses necessary prior to initiation of construction.
Final design and engineering work will also be initiated for the down-
selected project(s). To be down-selected a project must appear to meet
the project eligibility standards contained in Sec. 268.11 (b), rate
highly in the project selection criteria specified in Sec. 268.17, be
judged by FRA to have a good chance of being constructed with the
Federal funds authorized for this program, and be successfully operated
by a public/private partnership.
[[Page 749]]
(b) Only one project will be selected in Phase IV of the Maglev
Deployment Program and be eligible for any Federal construction funds
that Congress chooses to make available. That one project must meet each
and every project eligibility standard contained in Sec. 268.11 (b). If
more than one project down-selected in Phase III and funded through
Phase IV meets all of these standards, then FRA will evaluate and
compare the eligible projects according to the set of project selection
criteria contained in Sec. 268.17.
(c) In reviewing competing projects under the project eligibility
standards and project selection criteria, the FRA will exercise
particular vigilance regarding the following elements of the
preconstruction planning process, although not to the exclusion of
others:
(1) The credibility of the demand and revenue forecasts, cost
estimates, and benefit/cost comparisons; and
(2) The credibility of the financial plan.
(d) FRA intends to make periodic reviews of the processes and
products of grant recipients. Such reviews may include, at the FRA's
option, reviews at key milestones in the preparation of project
descriptions.
[[Page 751]]
Copyright Notice
© 1996 - 2026. Unless otherwise noted, the contents of http://trains.rockycrater.org
are copyrighted to A.J. Kleipass. All rights are reserved. Reuse without permission is forbidden. Downloadable material, including but not limited to maps and posters,
are intended for personal, non-commercial use to aid in model railroad design and construction only.
Visitor #1772 since December 29, 2016 (when all counters were reset). :: Last Modified: 19-Jun-2004 at 17:52 UTC :: Page was generated in 0.002684 seconds.